CUT&RUN delivers the power of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) or ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq), only takes one to two days to go from cells to DNA, and can be used with as few as 5K to 20K cells. Like any antibody-based technique, identifying a compatible antibody is a critical part of ensuring assay success. CUT&RUN is a relatively new technique, limiting the number of validated antibodies for the application. Therefore, some companies recommend using ChIP- or ChIP-seq-validated antibodies for CUT&RUN since all three techniques are used to analyze protein-DNA interactions across the genome in cells and tissues.
But do all ChIP-validated antibodies really work in a CUT&RUN assay? In fact, we have found this not to be the case. Let's explore why.
Even though both ChIP and CUT&RUN assays are used to profile chromatin, there are significant differences between the methodologies that can impact antibody recognition. A summary of these differences is provided in Table 1.
ChIP |
CUT&RUN |
|
Sample Preparation |
Cross-link chromatin with formaldehyde and lyse cells. |
Bind cells to Concanavalin A-coated magnetic beads and permeabilize cell membrane with digitonin. |
Chromatin Enrichment |
In vitro immunoprecipitation using an antibody specific for a DNA binding protein or histone modification. |
In vivo enrichment, where the antibody specific for a DNA binding protein, cofactor, or histone modification enters the nuclei after cell membrane permeabilization. |
Chromatin Fragmentation |
Non-targeted enzymatic digestion with MNase or mechanically using sonication to shear the chromatin prior to chromatin immunoprecipitation. |
Targeted enzymatic digestion during enrichment based on the interaction of a primary antibody with pAG-MNase. |
Chromatin/Protein State |
Fragmented chromatin containing partially denatured histones and DNA-binding proteins. |
Contiguous chromatin with histones and DNA binding proteins in their native conformations. |
Table 1: ChIP and CUT&RUN methodologies.
We tested antibodies for over 100 (and counting!) target proteins and found that only 50-60% of ChIP- or ChIP-seq antibodies were compatible with CUT&RUN. ChIP experiments were run using the SimpleChIP Plus Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Magnetic Beads) #9005, while CUT&RUN experiments were performed using the CUT&RUN Assay Kit #86652 and DNA Purification Buffers and Spin Columns (ChIP, CUT&RUN) #14209. Downstream quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses were performed using SimpleChIP Universal qPCR Master Mix #88989 and DNA library preparation was done using the DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN) #56795 and Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (Dual Index Primers) #47538. NG-seq was performed using an Illumina NextSeq Platform.
When Stat1 (D1K9Y) Rabbit mAb #14994, which is ChIP-validated, and Stat1 (D4Y6Z) Rabbit mAb #14995, which is ChIP- and ChIP-seq-validated, were tested, both antibodies demonstrated robust enrichment of target genes in ChIP (Figure 1A). Stat1 #14994 did not generate passable data for ChIP-seq, but it did show enrichment in the CUT&RUN assay. On the other hand, Stat1 #14995, which is validated for ChIP and ChIP-seq, did not work for CUT&RUN since there was no observed enrichment for known STAT1 target genes IRF1 or AIM2 (Figure 1B).
Three Stat3 antibodies were also tested: Stat3 (124H6) Mouse mAb #9139 and Stat3 (79D7) Rabbit mAb #4904, which are both ChIP- and ChIP-seq-validated, and Stat3 (D3Z2G) Rabbit mAb #12640. Again, all three antibodies robustly enriched target genes using ChIP (Figure 2A), but only Stat3 #9139 demonstrated robust target gene enrichment with CUT&RUN (Figure 2B). Stat3 #12640 did show some target gene enrichment in CUT&RUN, but ultimately did not meet Cell Signaling Technology (CST) validation criteria because a low genomic signal-to-noise ratio was observed.
Antibody |
ChIP Validated |
ChIP-seq Validated |
Works on CUT&RUN |
Stat1 (D1K9Y) Rabbit mAb #14994 |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Stat1 (D4Y6Z) Rabbit mAb #14995 |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Stat3 (124H6) Mouse mAb #9139 |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Stat3 (79D7) Rabbit mAb #4904 |
Yes |
No |
No |
Stat3 (D3Z2G) Rabbit mAb #12640 |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Table 2: Summary of described antibodies tested on CUT&RUN.
As these two examples illustrate, relying solely on the fact that an antibody is validated for ChIP or ChIP-seq does not necessarily guarantee CUT&RUN success. Therefore, the best bet is to use a CST CUT&RUN-validated antibody to ensure success. However, you can start with ChIP- or ChIP-seq-validated antibodies if a CUT&RUN-validated antibody hasn’t been identified yet. Just be aware that you’ll likely need to screen different antibodies to find one that will work.
To save you time and money that you’d otherwise spend testing antibodies yourself, CST is actively validating CUT&RUN antibodies for you!
CST is known for having stringent validation standards to ensure antibodies will work for your application, and it’s no different when it comes to validating antibodies for CUT&RUN. To provide antibodies that are proven to work in CUT&RUN, we test all of our antibodies using the CUT&RUN Assay Kit #86652, the DNA Purification Buffers and Spin Columns (ChIP, CUT&RUN) #14209, the SimpleChIP Universal qPCR Master Mix #8898, the DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina #56795 (ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN), and the Multiplex Oligos for Illumna (Dual Index Primers) #47538.
Antibodies must pass all of the following criteria to qualify as a CUTRUN-validated antibody:
Using ChIP- or ChIP-seq-validated antibodies for CUT&RUN does not automatically guarantee success since only 50-60% of them are compatible. Before you spend time screening antibodies yourself, be sure to check our ever-growing list of CUT&RUN antibodies validated by CST. You may be able to save yourself valuable time!